Warnicke support the theory that Anne’s miscarriage must have been abnormal saying, “Her fall was almost certainly triggered by the nature of the miscarriage she was to suffer in late January, for there is no evidence that she had been in any personal or political danger [prior]…”*
We know this statement is misleading; careful examination of primary sources show us that Chapuys had written to Charles V speaking of the King’s new love interest Jane Seymour more than three months prior to Anne’s miscarriage. In the letter, Chapuys reveals that Henry had been wooing Jane with expensive gifts and paying her a lot of attention. It also becomes apparent through the use of these documents that the rumors regarding the Queen’s allegedly malformed fetus were not evident until almost thirty years after her death. The tales of Anne’s reproductive woes, physical deformities and witchcraft were spread by Roman priests, especially Nicholas Sander, as they sought to undermine Elizabeth’s claim to the English throne. Despite the lack of evidence for fetal abnormalities, I believe that Anne’s miscarriage damaged her relationship with Henry. She had miscarried several time, causing him to question her ability to provide him with a legitimate heir. She had also had heated confrontation with his trusted advisor Thomas Cromwell, resulting in the loss of him as her ally. Henry’s marriage to Anne had caused significant political tension between England and the other Catholic countries on the continent, but especially the Holy Roman Empire. The pregnancy shook Henry’s faith in Anne, but it was not the moment he decided to put her aside in favor of another woman. There were many factors, political, religious and familial that contributed to Anne’s fall and there is no evidence other than conjecture that Henry decided to bring charges against Anne for miscarrying a malformed child.
*Excerpt taken from The Rise and Fall of Anne Boleyn: Family Politics in the Court of Henry VIII

Why did she have so many miscarriages? Is that normal? Was something wrong with her?
ReplyDeleteHello again Alicia! First of all thank you for your wonderful questions every week! Now to answer: Miscarriages were quite common during this time. It is the sad reality of the period; women often recieved almost no medical care, wine was the preferred beverage as water was seen as unclean and malnutrition as well as deficiencies in minerals and vitamins were unavoidable. However, in Anne's case we can only confirm that she miscarried twice in three years. Given the environmental and health factors of the 16th century this is not an altogether overly high number. Infant mortality rates were around 55-65% with Anne's being slightly higher at 66.6%. However, given that she was executed during her child-bearing years we have no way of knowing whether subsequent pregnancies would have ended the same way which would have changed her fetus survival rates either positively or negatively. Thanks for the question!
ReplyDelete